logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.04.14 2017고단182
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 17, 2016, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (hereinafter “The Punishment of Minor Offenses Act”) : (a) went into the E District District located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu; (b) and (c) the police officers in the Republic of Korea were able to put about about 10 minutes of alcohol, including, but not limited to, the use of C cab operated by B on November 17, 2016; and (d) the Defendant, while drinking for about 10 minutes of alcohol, conveyed or flicked by very rough words and actions at a government office.

2. The Defendant, on November 17, 2016, arrested a flagrant offender in violation of the Punishment of Fraud and Minor Offenses Act in E District on the grounds of the violation of the Act on Punishment of Fraud and the Punishment of Minor Offenses, transferred to the F Office of the U.S. Police Station F Office located in the 1338 U.S. in Manyang-gu, U.S., the Defendant sent his cell phone to G at the 21:38 U.S. on the same day, and changed the cell phone back to G and sound to the victim at around 21:38.

In addition, the victim was openly insulting, among the civil petitioners, H, I, etc., by referring to the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.

3. On November 17, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) around 23:10 on November 17, 2016, at the F Office of the F Office of the Yongsan Police Station at Japan, the Defendant was unable to conduct an investigation against the Defendant under the influence of Gyeong G, and was provided with a fidelity guarantee from his family members; and (b) on the part of the said G, the Defendant attempted to unfasten the locks of the Defendant’s left hand in order to release the Defendant; and (c) the said G, stating that “this -------------------------

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the release of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to G and B;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, respectively, shall be punished by a fine.

arrow