1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds alleged in the trial of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiffs in the first instance, and even if all evidence submitted in the first instance and the purport of the entire pleadings in the first instance and the first instance trial are examined, the plaintiffs' lawsuit in this case is unlawful, since there is no legal interest to seek revocation of the disposition in this case, and the judgment of the court of first instance that the lawsuit in this case is unlawful.

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of some contents as follows. Thus, the court's explanation on this case is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The judgment of the first instance court was rendered on November 14, 2014 (Seoul District Court 2014Guhap21358) and on November 20, 2015 (Seoul District Court 2015Du4021) between the fifth fifth sentence and the fifth sentence in the fourth fifth sentence of the first instance, “The continuing of the case to the Daegu High Court (2015du58),” and “The appellate court was sentenced on November 20, 2015 (Seoul High Court 2015Nu4021),” and the continuing of the case to the Supreme Court (Supreme Court 2015Du58911).”

The 6hhhhhh of the judgment of the first instance court, "However, the plaintiffs claim that the vessel suffers from any property or living disadvantage due to any change in the navigational time of the vessel of this case without any specific assertion or proof as to the use purpose, timing, frequency of use, and such a situation, etc., and that the vessel of this case suffers from property or living disadvantage due to any change in the navigation time of this case as the movement of the vessel of this case is more inconvenience than before. Such circumstance alone is legally protected by the plaintiffs due to any change in the navigation time of the vessel of this case.