1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) (1) Of Ulsan-gun C Forest land 909 square meters, the attached drawings indication 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 17, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant: (a) determined the site area of approximately 120 square meters in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S. C Forest and about 909 square meters and approximately 853 square meters in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S., which is owned by the Defendant from the Defendant, after surveying the site area; (b) paid the down payment at KRW 3,00,000; and (c) written a document that purchases the balance at KRW 70,000 per square meter.

The Plaintiff paid KRW 3,000,000 to the Defendant around that time.

나. 위 약 120평에 대한 측량결과 원고가 피고로부터 매수하는 토지는 울산 울주군 C 임야 909㎡ 중 별지 도면 표시 ㄱ, ㄴ, ㄷ, ㄹ, ㅁ, ㅂ, ㅅ, ㅎ, ㄱ의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 (가)부분 285㎡ 및 D 임야 853㎡ 중 별지 도면 표시 ㅎ, ㅅ, ㅇ, ㅈ, ㅊ, ㅋ, ㅌ, ㅍ, ㅎ의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 (나)부분 211㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 각 부동산’이라고 한다)로 정해졌다.

C. On July 31, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 70,500,000 to the Defendant the amount of KRW 10,500,000 per square meter (150 square meters) of each real estate of this case, which is KRW 10,50,000, among the down payment of KRW 3,000,000.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, Gap evidence 5, and Gap evidence 6

2. The assertion and judgment

(a) basic facts 1.a;

(1) The plaintiff asserts that the document No. 1 is a sales contract, and the defendant's signature is necessary to conduct land survey by E, a broker on the day of preparation as a description of the object of brokerage handled by the real estate intermediary, and thus, it cannot be deemed that the sales contract for each real estate of this case was concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant.

In full view of the following facts: (a) evidence No. 1, evidence No. 9-1, and evidence No. 9-2; and (b) witness F and E’s testimony, the form of the above document is different from the sale and purchase contract; or (c) the document form is different from the sale and purchase contract.