logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.06.18 2014고단1355
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

210,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person handling narcotics shall be the defendant.

1. Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics;

A. On March 2014, the Defendant received approximately 2.5 g of marijuana from C in front of a bath to which it is impossible to identify the trade name in the valley dong at the early stage of smuggling, and received marijuana.

B. The defendant under the same year

4. 10. At the end of the defendant's house located D around 10. A.

As in the same paragraph, approximately 0.5g of marijuana received and possessed by E has received 0.5g of marijuana from E.

C. The Defendant B.

When, at the time, at the place specified in the port, after deducting tobacco smokes, 0.5g of marijuana was put in, and smoked in a way of smoking with E by attaching a fire.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with E, smoked marijuana.

On the 16th of the same month, at around 19:40, the defendant's house behind the above defendant's house, Ga.

In the same way, approximately 1.5g of marijuana received and possessed by E was arrested to E, and did not bring about such arrest, and did not commit an attempted crime.

2. Violation of the Narcotics Control Act;

A. At around March of the same year, the Defendant: (a) parked in the G parking lot adjacent to the G building located in the G in the Tyang-si; (b) taken approximately 0.06g of psychotropic drugs from H, cambropers (the “copon”; hereinafter the “copon”); and (c) administered approximately 0.03g of 0.03g of them in the manner of drinking together with water.

B. On the 13th day of the same month, the defendant parked in the lower part of the above defendant's office.

In the same way, approximately 0.03g of philophones received and possessed as in the same paragraph were administered in a way of drinking together with water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. A copy of each police interrogation protocol regarding E and I;

1. A copy of the statement made to J or K by the police;

1. Response to the request for appraisal;

1. Written prosecution (a police suspect interrogation protocol of H);

1. Statement of seizure;

arrow