Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for 6 months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 20,000,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s co-principal are the business owners of the massage treatment establishment “H” located on the first basement of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, who have overall control over the business of the said massage treatment establishment. Defendant B, as the massage treatment establishment, is a person who has provided Defendant A with advice on overall operation of the said business establishment, such as concluding a lease contract of the said massage treatment establishment, the massage management, the employment of employees, and the employment of female employees.

On August 7, 2014, the Defendants received 190,000 won from customers I who found the above “H” as the price for sexual traffic, and had the employeesJ of the above “H” perform sexual intercourse with the above I, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

From July 7, 2014 to August 8, 2014, the Defendants conspired to engage in the act of arranging sexual traffic, such as raising sales of approximately KRW 43 million, by providing a shower facility in the area of about 200 square meters, with one shower facility, 15 guest rooms, shower rooms, and 12 shower rooms equipped with a shower room, bed, and employing a female employee J, K, L, etc., and arranging them to receive KRW 190,000 in exchange for sexual traffic from an unspecified number of customers who find the place, and allowing them to do sexual intercourse with the said female employees.

2. Defendant C is the actual owner of “G building” in which the said “H” is located.

around June 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) in the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Building, despite being aware that the said “H” place of business was provided for commercial sex acts, the Defendant leased a deposit of KRW 100 million to A, monthly rent of KRW 9,500,00; and (b) allowed A to engage in commercial sex acts, such as arranging commercial sex acts, from July 7, 2014 to August 8, 2014, as prescribed in paragraph (1).

As a result, the defendant knowingly provided a building to sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against M, N,O, P, K, L, Q, R, I, and J;

1. A copy of the business account book on the enforcement date, on-site photograph and a lease contract;