(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.06.11 2018고단2994

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.06.11 2018고단2994

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaging in driving freight B.

On October 13, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on October 10, 2010, and continued to drive the vehicle directly along a two-lane 268K road from the direction south of the petition-gu, the Seocho-gu, and the Jung-do, the Jung-do.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering left and left well and the steering gear for those engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the back portion of the left side of the K7 vehicle driven by the victim C (W, 34 years old) who was under the stop in the front of the vehicle due to negligent negligence, has the back portion of the vehicle driven by the victim C (W, 34 years old) in front of the right side of the vehicle of the defendant, and continuously D has the back portion of the franchise vehicle driven by the defendant vehicle as the front side of the right side of the vehicle of the defendant vehicle and caused the franchiseer to be pushed down in the future, and the victim E (W, 26 years old) is driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim C, the victim F (ma, 5 years old), and the victim E, respectively, due to the foregoing occupational negligence, approximately KRW 21 million of repair cost, and the rash vehicle was damaged to cover approximately KRW 900,000 of repair cost.

2. The determination shall not be charged against the express will of the victim under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act.

However, according to the records, the victims can recognize the fact that they have withdrawn their wish to punish the defendant by submitting a written agreement through the defendant on May 17, 2019, which was after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act is applicable.

참조조문

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2014.07.25 2013고단6696 (1)

-서울남부지방법원 2013.04.18 2013고단494

-부산지방법원 2012.11.14 2012고단5432

-인천지방법원 2013.06.12 2013고단1913

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.05.04 2017고단2495