A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 4, 2014, the Defendant interfered with business operation: (a) at the “E restaurant operated by the victim D” operated by the victim D of the victim D in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu; (b) on November 4, 2014, the Defendant asserted that he/she was his/her own clothes of the victim, who was on the table table, and claimed that he/she was requested by the victim to return his/her clothes; and (c) caused the disturbance of the victim to go out of the victim’s head, thereby obstructing the female restaurant business by force.

2. On November 4, 2014, the Defendant interfered with restaurant business operations at the places indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) at the time, as seen in the foregoing paragraph (1), and continuously avoided disturbance even if he/she received a request from the head of the police station located in the Gyeonggi-do Police Station, the Gyeonggi-do Police Station that received 112 a report and received the said request, and notified the reason for the arrest, etc., and attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender, and then promptly asked the relevant G’s He/she’s He/she was asked to buckbuckbbbbbbs, thereby leaving the right side to which the number of treatment days cannot be known to the said G.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of police officers to the scene and the arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time injured the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. Statement of opinion;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on details of damage photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending sentence] general injury (general injury) of the Criminal Act, the mitigated area (two to one year) (special mitigations/special mitigations/special mitigations) and the recovery of damage.