AS Investment Development Co., Ltd. (Law Firm Open, Attorney Lee Sung-hoon, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

Defendant

September 21, 2017

Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2016Gadan29900 Decided June 15, 2017

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant delivers the building listed in the attached list to the plaintiff, and pays 6,630,000 won with 15% interest per annum from the day following the day of service of the copy of the claim and the application for modification of the cause of the claim as of March 8, 2017 to the day of complete payment. The defendant pays 73,300 won per month from March 2, 2017 to the day of full payment.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of the court's explanation on this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except where Gap evidence Nos. 9 and 11, which are insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion as evidence to be submitted additionally in the trial, are the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[Attachment]

Judges Jeong Chang-jin (Presiding Judge)