Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

On March 28, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year due to special intimidation, violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., injury, and assault at Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court), and the judgment was finalized on May 15, 2018.

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name "C (D)" from the underground floor of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

The defendant and E, upon reporting by the victims F and other women of sexual traffic, undergo investigations into suspicion of sexual traffic, such as arranging sexual traffic, in the police, had the women of sexual traffic threatened with them to make a false statement at an investigative agency.

1. On October 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) went to the victim F without impeding documents; (b) the Defendant did so to the victim F.

On the other hand, E means that the same victim would not immediately interfere with the above documents, and the defendant threatened the victim F in collaboration with E.

2. At the place indicated in paragraph 1 at the end of October 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the victim F would die of his family in Vietnam unless it obstructs documents; (b) in E, the victim would not take any obstacle to documents; and (c) expressed that E would be at the time of the victim’s face due to the same victim’s illness; and (d) the Defendant threatened the victim in collaboration with E.

3. On November 16, 2016, the Defendant, along with E, would die at the house of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G VictimF if the Defendant does not engage in commercial sex acts again to the victim at the house of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G VictimF.

The joint intimidation of the victims was made by asserting that the victims would not go to go to Vietnam, and the victims were jointly threatened.

Summary of Evidence

1. The contents of the victim’s statement about the act of the witness F’s legal statement and E, whether there was any other person at the time, the act of the victim, etc. present at the time are consistent and concrete with the investigative agency from the investigative agency to the present court.

The above statements are written statements by the police about L.