Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 800,00, and by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.
The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 1, 2014, at around 23:00, Defendant A 1 d'D' at the d'D' in the first floor underground of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building, Defendant A d', while drinking alcohol, e', etc. at the next seat while drinking alcohol, and Defendant A d'B (35 years of age) and F(36 years of age). The victims tried to calculate the amount of injury and arrange for the injury.
At this time, the Defendant expressed the victim F, who wanted to calculate, and had the victim F, talk with each other, and the above E was in his arms to cut the victim F's neck and bomb with her hand, and the Defendant went beyond the floor by putting the victim F's head debt.
Accordingly, the defendant committed violence against the victims jointly with the above E.
2. Defendant B
A. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) went through alcohol with the victim A (31 years of age), the victim E (47 years of age) and vision at the same time and time as set forth in paragraph (1). As such, the above F, by hand, went on the part of the victim E, and went on the ship after cutting off the victim E with his arms. The Defendant, by hand, was flicking the victim A’s breath, and threatened the victim A’s breath, and the above G was flicking the bed with the bed with the bed with the bed with the bed with the bed with the bed on the floor.
Accordingly, the defendant committed violence against the victims jointly with the above F and G.
B. On October 2, 2014, from around 00:40 to 01:40, the Defendant threatened the police officer’s face, who reported follow-up duties following the arrest of a flagrant offender, such as making up a letter of arrest of a flagrant offender, to take a cellular phone and not keep the face of the police officer who is in charge of the follow-up duties following the arrest of a flagrant offender, among the criminal office of the Guro-gu Seoul Police Station from around 00:40 to around 01:40, the Defendant threatened the police officer of the performance of official duties, namely, taking the face of the police officer who is in charge of the follow-up duties following the arrest of a flagrant offender.
Accordingly, the defendant, by intimidation, has interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers reporting follow-up duties for the arrest of flagrant offenders.
b)a summary of the evidence;