1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

가. B는 2014. 3. 22. 04:50경 C 쏘나타 택시(이하 택시라고 한다)를 운전하여 울산 남구 삼산로 농수산물시장 사거리 앞 도로를 롯데백화점 방면에서 태화강역 방면으로 3차로를 따라 직진하다가 위 사거리의 횡단보도를 보행자 적색 신호에 횡단하던 D(이하 망인이라 한다)을 충돌하였고, 망인은 약 19m 튕겨 나가 도로에 쓰러졌다

(hereinafter referred to as the "first accident") E driving a FMobage car (hereinafter referred to as the "FMobage car") and driving on the same room as a taxi according to the two-lanes of the above road, while serving in the same room as a taxi, the deceased was on the duty of the first accident.

(hereinafter referred to as "the second accident"). A driven a G lus car (hereinafter referred to as "lus car") and concealed the fee immediately after the second accident while following the fee.

(hereinafter referred to as "third accident"). (b)

The Deceased died due to the high level of damages, etc. at the site of the first, second, and third accidents.

C. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with the taxi, and the Defendant is an insurer that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the taxi.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Eul evidence 1-2-8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff’s driver found the deceased and suspended the her mother expenses, but the her mother was fluored with the deceased at the mother’s expense as the her mother was concealed. 2) The her driver is liable for the death of the deceased with the taxi driver and the joint tortfeasor, and the her fault ratio is 50%, and the Plaintiff, the insurer of the si, paid KRW 110,529,000 to the deceased’s heir.

3) Therefore, the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff KRW 55,264,500 ( KRW 110,529,000 x 50% x delay damages).

B. As alleged by the Plaintiff, the driver of the mother-in-child found the deceased and suspended the mother-in-child expenses, but Orsa.