logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.03 2016고단2373
사기등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of ten months;

2. The defendant B: Provided, That the defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant A was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on May 19, 2009, and applied for review thereof on March 31, 201, and was sentenced to two years and two months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the same court on March 31, 2010, and was released from the previous prison on December 24, 201, and the parole period expired on May 7, 201.

[2] Criminal facts: “2016 High Order 2373 – The Defendants’ fraud Defendant A is the representative director of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “G”) for the purpose of selling real estate and selling real estate by proxy in Naju City, and Defendant B is the inside director of G and the head of the sales headquarters.

On September 13, 2014, the Defendants concluded a sales agency contract with H as an executor and a sales agent with G as an sales agent, with respect to the “J” building (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) that is scheduled to be newly built in the Republic of Korea, a company H with limited liability in the agricultural company (hereinafter “H”) in the Republic of Korea, and as to the “J” building (hereinafter “instant commercial building”).

In principle, the Defendants concluded a sales contract upon entering into a sales contract as above, and in exceptional cases, the sales contract should be concluded under the management of H, and the sales price should be deposited into the account designated by H, and there was no approval from H as to the sale at the discounted price of the instant commercial building.

1. Nevertheless, on February 2015, the Defendants concluded that the sales price of the instant commercial building No. 201 (p. 103 April 4) was KRW 750,000 or KRW 450,000,000 to KRW 450,000,00,000, in the office of “M-authorized Broker” located in the office of “M-authorized Broker” located in the Nam-si L. 114 of the instant commercial building, which was operated by the Victim K, the Defendants were false to the effect that “The victims K and N would build one and two-lane commercial buildings in H at L., and I would start up two-lanes after the start of the O. The sales price of the instant commercial building would be KRW 150,00,000 among the secondary sales price.”

Therefore, the Defendants are victims K and N as above.

arrow