Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above judgment against the Defendants for two years from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On April 15, 2010, the Seoul Eastern District Court was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on October 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 23, 2010.

The Defendants, who enter into an agency contract with a construction company and carry out a sales agency contract for sales in commercial buildings, officetels, etc., are required to enter into a sales agency contract with the construction company, and the victims I are willing to induce the victims I to receive money from the victims under the pretext of borrowing money.

around July 18, 2008, the Defendants are in the K Joint Legal Office of Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul J notary public, and the Defendant A is in sales agency for the commercial buildings, etc. of the Gyeonggi-gu L Apartment-gu, Soyang-gu, Seoul, on behalf of the victims, and the down payment to the construction company is needed.

In order to lend KRW 150,000 to be used as the down payment, the principal shall be repaid in the amount of KRW 150,000,000,000, and the commercial building shall be sold in the amount of KRW 150,000 after three months or more if the victim wishes to do so.

The phrase "A" is false, and the defendant B will be the victim's "A will act as a sales agent for the above commercial buildings together with A" and the above sales agency project will be the main part of the project.

The Defendants made a false statement, and prepared a certificate of borrowing that the Defendants borrowed KRW 300 million from the injured party, making eight of the Defendants joint and several suretys for the above obligation, and draw up a fair certificate of monetary consumption and loan contract with this content.

However, in fact, the Defendants did not have entered into a contract for vicarious sale with M, so even if they borrowed KRW 150 million from the damaged person, the Defendants paid KRW 150 million after the month of the first month, and there was no intention or ability to sell the said commercial building to the victim more than KRW 150 million or to sell the said commercial building after the three months.

In the end, the Defendants deceiving the victims as above and are affiliated with them at the National Bank in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jongno-gu, Seoul.