beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for six months, and for ten months, for defendant C.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Records] Defendant C was sentenced to one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution on March 12, 2015 by the Seoul Central District Court for violation of the Narcotics Control Act, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 20th of the same month.
[Criminal facts]
1. The Defendants jointly committed the crime of the crime of the Defendants (the fraud of the employee full-time loan loan) is the brode of the loan, Defendant A was the false lessee, and Defendant B was the false lessor, and the Defendants prepared a false certificate of employment, a charter contract, etc. with the brogates, etc., and submitted it to the financial institution entrusted with the operation and management of the National Housing Fund from the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs in order to have the employees’ full-time loan funds illegally
Accordingly, around September 2013, Defendant C et al. drafted a false employment certificate, income tax source collection certificate, etc. as Defendant A et al., and Defendant A and Defendant B prepared a false lease contract for 401 multi-household houses in Seoul, Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Seoul, under the name of Defendant B, and transferred each of the above documents to Defendant A, the applicant for the loan.
On September 5, 2013, Defendant A submitted a false employment certificate, a charter party contract, etc. to employees in charge of personal in-house loans at the government branch of the victim Industrial Bank of Korea located in 487-6, Dong Government-dong 487-6, and applied for a loan of the National Housing Fund of KRW 96 million as if the loan was actually used as deposit money.
However, the above certificate of employment and the contract of lease on a deposit basis were prepared falsely, and the defendants did not actually conclude the contract of lease on a deposit basis or have no intention to use the loan as a deposit for lease on a deposit basis.
Nevertheless, the Defendants are against the victim company.