beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.
, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On January 6, 2014, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) followed the victims who were f (17 years of age) and the victims G (18 years of age) going out of the above packing horse on the ground that they f (17 years of age) f (the victims) were frighten in the packaging horse in front of the E parking lot located in Do, and were drinking at the front of the E parking lot, and fright out of the above packing horse on the ground that they were frighten, and fright out of the above packing horse. The Defendants f face of the victim F (the victims) were fright at a time when they were frighten in drinking. When the Defendants fright and part of the face of the victim were frighted to drinking and fright back to the victim, and when the victims G were fright back to the victim's face when they were frightd to drinking and fright up to the victim's face, Defendant B and h 17 years of the victim.
As a result, the Defendants jointly put the injury to the victim F in the upper left side of about 42 days of medical treatment and the 5-thring to the upper side of the 42-day river, and put the victim G, the victim I, the victim I, and the victim H on the face with which the number of days of medical treatment cannot be known.
2. At around 03:25 on January 6, 2014, the Defendants of the obstruction of performance of official duties expressed an explanation about the procedure for handling the case from the slope K and the Inspector L belonging to the said district police station in relation to the injury cases described in paragraph (1) at the Janju Police Station office, and Defendant B, who was under investigation at the said district, took a bath to the said F, stating that the said F, who was in charge of the investigation at the said district, was off all the f’s humb., and Defendant A said F, “F hum hume” and Defendant A said F, “F hum hum hume, hum hume” and humbed F, on the ground that the F was hume and humeed.