All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment respectively) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendants recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the practically acquired profits are relatively insignificant (Defendant A: 2.6 million won, Defendant C: 2.4 million won), the Defendants did not lead the crime of this case, and all the Defendants did not have any criminal history exceeding the fine, etc. are favorable to the Defendants.

However, the crime of this case is so-called Bophishing, which has a very poor quality of the crime, because the crime of this case is organized, planned, and intelligent, which is operated in the form of a occupied organization, and has structural characteristics that make it difficult to detect and arrest a criminal. In particular, the crime of Bophishing has been committed since long since many people have been suffering from damage, but it is practically difficult to punish those who planned and directed the crime in China, on the other hand, it is more realistic to punish subordinate officers in light of the characteristics of the crime of Bophishing and the current investigation conditions, and there is a great need to strictly punish them in consideration of the need to collect a large number of cash withdrawals from cash withdrawals, and there is a serious adverse effect on the trust relationship between public institutions and financial transactions, and thus making it difficult to discover and arrest a good person's daily life. In particular, the crime of Bophishing has been committed since long started and many people have suffered damage, but it is difficult to do so.