The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of imprisonment (eight months) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.

2. The crime committed by the Defendant’s participation in the judgment refers to the following: (a) the method of committing the crime causes in a systematic, planned, intelligent, intelligent, and unspecified number of unspecified persons to inflict a non-discriminatory and serious adverse effect on the trust relationship of the society as a whole; (b) the crime of this case is committed by providing the account to be used for the crime of Bosing and withdrawing and delivering the money deposited in the account; (c) the nature of the crime is not good; (d) the victim’s damage has not been recovered; (d) there is no special circumstance or change of circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the pronouncement of the judgment of the court below; and (e) other various sentencing conditions that are shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age and behavior, and the circumstances before and after the crime

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.