logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.01.30 2014노1685
사기
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the punishment of the court below (one and half years of imprisonment) is inappropriate.

2. The judgment of the Defendants recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the Defendants did not gain profit from the crime of this case, or appears to be small amount, and that there seems to exist social ties, such as Defendant B’s father’s desireing the above Defendant’s wife, and the Defendants were the primary offender, and there is room for somewhat taking into account the circumstances leading up to the Defendants’ participation, etc. are factors for sentencing favorable to the Defendants.

However, the crime of this case was committed by acquiring the money of the victims through the so-called Bosing method, which is organized, planned, intelligent, and organized, and operated in a short term, and operated in the form of a braille, with structural characteristics that make it difficult to detect and arrest an unspecified number of victims, and with substantial adverse effects on the trust relationship to the whole society, and causing a serious anxiety in the lives of good people, and the nature of the crime is extremely poor, and the defendants took part in the call center staff of the Bosing organization of this case. The defendants took part in the crime of this case. This is an essential role in the Bosing crime, and the degree of their participation is not somewhat weak. In full view of all the factors to impose punishment against the defendants, including the fact that there is a need to punish the assistants in view of the characteristics of the Bosing crime and the current investigation conditions, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, the sentence of the court below against the defendants is proper.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow