logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2017.09.26 2017가단2573
건물인도 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants jointly indicate 10, 11, 12, 9, 9, among the three real estates listed in the separate sheet.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On July 4, 2016, the Plaintiff (Defendant B) and the order No. 1-A.

With respect to the building mentioned in the port, a lease contract with a deposit of KRW 1 million and KRW 320,000 per month was concluded, and the defendants were residing in the above building.

However, Defendant B did not pay the rent after paying a three-month monthly rent.

Accordingly, the above lease contract is terminated by serving a duplicate of the complaint of this case.

B. Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to deliver the said building to the Plaintiff, and Defendant B is obligated to pay unjust enrichment at the rate of KRW 320,000 per month from September 6, 2017 to September 320, 200, inasmuch as only three-month rent out of the 14-month rent as of September 5, 2017 was unpaid, and unjust enrichment at the rate of KRW 3520,000 per month from September 6, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the said building. Defendant C jointly with Defendant B is obligated to pay unjust enrichment at the rate of KRW 320,000 per month from June 1, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the said building.

2. Judgment made by confession, deemed confession and by public notice;

(a) Judgment by deeming the confession (Defendant B) to be made, Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act

B. Judgment by publication (Defendant C) Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act

arrow