logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.07.10 2017가단25767
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) From February 2, 2016, Ga.

subsection (b).

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of arguments and arguments as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including each number number), and the following facts: (a) on November 2, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract with the Defendant as to the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "real estate of this case") with the lease deposit of one million won; (b) on November 2, 2015, on November 2, 2015, with the lease deposit of one million won; (c) on October 30, 2017, with the lease term of this case from November 2, 2015 to October 30, 2017 (hereinafter "the lease contract of this case"); and (d) the Plaintiff’s delivery of the real estate of this case to the Defendant on November 2, 2015, without paying the lease term from November 2, 2015 to the Defendant; and (d) on July 20, 2016, the Plaintiff continued to occupy the lease contract of this case.

Therefore, barring special circumstances, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, and to pay the Plaintiff a rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent from February 2, 2016 to the date of completion of delivery of the instant real estate from February 2, 2016 to November 2, 2015, which was sought by the Plaintiff.

[1.40,000 won (=380,000 won x 3 months) of the unpaid rent accrued from November 2, 2015 to February 1, 2016 shall be deducted from the lease deposit as the Plaintiff is the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Defendant promised to create toilets to the lessee of the instant real estate, and the Defendant (or his/her dependent C) concluded the instant lease agreement with the belief of the said agreement. The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff.

arrow