1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiff, which orders additional payment, shall be revoked.

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. On the third page 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “in relation to the Defendant’s vehicle” shall be applied to the Defendant’s vehicle.

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court "(general outdoor workers) 15 (the calculation shall be based on the ordinary person's income, in the absence of any data on income and experience, while engaging in Kwikset service using Lao)."

From 3th to 4th 2th 1th 2th 2th 20th 2th 3th 3th 200.

[1] 12% of the labor ability loss rate due to the left-hand general balvegosis, permanent disability [the application of the occupational coefficient 4] and the physical disability of the first instance court to the effect that the Plaintiff is an outdoor employee and the Plaintiff is an occupational figure 3. However, according to the overall purport of the statement and oral argument as to the evidence No. 7, it is recognized that the Plaintiff was engaged in Kwikset Service at the time of the accident. This constitutes “69. Minor Goods Delivery Board” among the occupational checks based on damaged variables, thereby applying the new occupational boundary coefficient 4 of the above occupation.

(2) The following paragraphs shall be specified:

[2] The first instance court's 4th 3th 5th 3th eth 5th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e.g.

The plaintiff asserts that "(the plaintiff has caused harm to the function not caused by the above Mabrogal damage, and therefore it is reasonable to regard damaged parts in the Mabrothal disability assessment table as "not "new boundary" but "not "new boundary" and to apply the occupational coefficient accordingly, but the court of first instance.