(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.22 2016나16909

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.22 2016나16909

손해배상(자)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be drieded (1) Parts 4, 9, and 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be dried as follows:

The Plaintiff lost the ability to work due to the aftermath disability: 33% (the B-2 of the B-2 of the B-2 of the Clobrid disability assessment table, the application of occupational coefficient 7), 14% of the ability to work due to the right-hand B-B-a, and the double disability rate 42.38% (=33% (1-3%) x 14%) of the double disability rate due to the loss of the ability to work due to the premathy of the B-B-a of the Clobrid disability assessment table, and the application of the occupational coefficient 5). ② On the 5th of the first instance judgment, the part of the “after treatment expenses” was added as follows.

[D. The plaintiff needs to pay KRW 8,730,00 for reflective malutical surgery, and KRW 3,490,00 for metal removal surgery, and the above cost for convenience shall be deemed to have been paid on May 18, 2016, which is the day following the date of closing argument in the trial, and when calculating the current price as of the date of the accident in this case, it shall be KRW 11,024,884."

3. In conclusion, the defendant's 348,385,710 won = 15,02,484 won positive damages of 298,383,226 won (affirmative: 102,60 won for nursing care expenses of 102,60 won for future treatment expenses of 11,024,884), among them, and 333,383,226 won for passive damages and consolation money of 333,383,226 won for the plaintiff from March 17, 2014, which is the date of the accident in this case, deemed reasonable to dispute over the existence or scope of the defendant's obligation to perform the duty to perform the duty to perform the duty to perform the duty to the court of first instance from March 17, 2014 to February 17, 2016; 15,200,484 won for active damages of 102,484 won); and

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.24 2018나54943

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.03 2017나26859

-부산지방법원 2016.07.21 2014나16712

-서울남부지방법원 2019.03.22 2018나58279

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.24 2016나9772