logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.03.22 2018나58279
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The part concerning the claim for damages against the Plaintiff for property in the judgment of the court of first instance, which orders additional payments below.

Reasons

1. The reasons why this Court shall state as to this case are as follows, and the reasons why this Court shall accept this case, except for the following additional determination as to the parts newly alleged in the appellate court, and as to the part newly alleged in the appellate court, are as follows, the reasons for the first instance judgment. Therefore, it shall be cited by the main sentence of Article 4

2. The 3rd judgment of the court of first instance shall consist of the 17th to 15th judgment of the court of first instance.

A. Matters recognized as actual income 1: The term “basic matters” in the separate sheet for calculation of damages amount: 2) income and operating period: Until he/she reaches age 65 (see Supreme Court Decision 2018Da248909, Feb. 21, 2019), Plaintiff A, who works on February 22, 201, entered into an employment contract with 4,16,666 won per month until he/she reaches age 65 (see Supreme Court Decision 2018Da248909, Feb. 21, 2019); and Plaintiff A, who works on March 14, 2016, immediately before the accident, entered into an employment contract with 4,16,666 won per month until he/she reaches age 66; however, Plaintiff A could have earned the total urban wage exceeding the urban wage at the time when the accident occurred.

It is insufficient to recognize that the period of operation of the plaintiff exceeds the above scope of recognition, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3) The left-hand edge (A) of the primary disability: 14% permanent disability [Application of Mabromone disability assessment table II-B-a, vocational coefficient 5] Na) the left-hand 4/5th disability of 14% permanent disability [Application of Mabrone disability assessment table 2-B-a, vocational coefficient 5] with the physical exercise due to the total balma of the balma, the labor ability loss rate of 2% permanent disability (a) with the total bale of the balerogate up to 60 degrees of the balerogate from the balero

(e) Overlapping disability ratio: 15.72% from June 14, 2016 to December 15, 2016: 10% (in the case of hospitalization period) from December 16, 2016 to September 9, 2021: 15.72% (5% from December 16, 201 to September 9, 2021): The statement in the column of “actual income” in the attached sheet of calculation of damages amount.

arrow