A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 2, 2013, the Defendant, at the “C convenience point in Spocheon-si B” around 21:38, 2013, went to the front of Spocheon-si Furg, where the Defendant was on the part of the female employees under the influence of alcohol and was on the part of the female employees, after receiving a report by the Defendant, and called for a disturbance, and went to the front of Spocheon-si Furg, which is the Defendant’s residence.

On August 22, 2013, at around 22:05, the Defendant left the said patrol vehicle, and then interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the patrol duty of the said police officer, by putting the head door of the patrol vehicle, obstructing the operation of the patrol vehicle by putting the police officer even, and putting the head door of the patrol vehicle, interfering with the operation of the patrol vehicle, and putting the cryp E (age 36) on the hand floor of the cryp E (age 36).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the G production;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act shall be considered

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;