A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014년 4월 중순 12:00경부터 12:30경까지 사이에 이천시 C에 있는 피해자 D(여, 57세) 운영의 E편의점에서 피해자에게 “손 한 번 잡아보자”라고 말하며 집적거리다가 피해자가 이를 거절하며 나가 달라고 요구하였다는 이유로 “씹할 년! 나 무시하냐 ”라고 욕설을 하고 위 편의점 내에 있는 다른 손님들에게도 “뭘 쳐다 봐, 안 꺼져, 씹할 놈아!”라고 욕설을 하는 등 소란을 피워 손님들이 편의점에서 나가게 함으로써 위력으로 피해자의 편의점 운영 업무를 방해하였다.

From around that time to September 21:30 on September 2015, the Defendant interfered with the operation of the convenience stores, etc. of victims by force over 12 times in total, as shown in the attached crime list, at the convenience stores and main points in Echeon-si, Leecheon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the F, G, H, and I;

1. Each statement of F, D, J, K, L, M and N;

1. 12 reported case handling table, respectively;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographic materials;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. From among concurrent crimes, a sentence shall be imposed in light of the unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant has continued to interfere with business of an unspecified number of convenience stores and restaurants with the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act, the fact that the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime, and that the defendant's neglect of alcohol alone seems difficult to prevent the same kind of crime in light of the degree of existence of alcohol of the defendant, etc.

In determining the term of punishment, the defendant's time of committing his/her crime, the defendant's agreement with G, which is the operator of the O convenience store among the victims, and the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case due to alcohol proof, and other favorable circumstances, and the age of the defendant.