1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

2...

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and announcement 1): Urban development project name (B district urban development zone, hereinafter “instant project”);

(2) Public notice: A public notice on December 13, 2007; D public notice on May 21, 2009; and notification on January 14, 2010; A public notice on January 14, 2010; project operator; Defendant:

B. Persons to be expropriated on May 1, 2012 by the Gyeongnam-do Regional Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “instant land”): F, G, and H land in Kimhae-si (hereinafter “instant land”).

3) As to the ground “I(J)”, the obstacles described in attached Table 1 to the “I(J)” (hereinafter “instant obstacles”).

(2) Compensation date for losses: The contents of the instant obstacles (including expenses for the relocation of facilities), 136,628,550 won, and the business compensation dismissal dismissal 4): The appraisal corporation and the appraisal corporation 50 won: (1) the allegation that the omitted items are reflected in the Defendant’s field investigation; (2) the allegation that the omitted items are found to be nonexistent in the course of the investigation; and (3) the appraisal corporation’s compensation for losses cannot be used for the previous purpose due to the transfer of the goods, if the removal of the goods cannot be used for the original purpose, the appraisal corporation’s compensation for losses was assessed at the price of the goods. (4) The appraisal corporation’s compensation for losses was determined to be reasonable in accordance with the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes; and (4) The Plaintiff’s compensation for losses to be assessed at the price of the goods in question, and the appraisal corporation’s compensation for losses to be located at the price of the goods in question.