1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,620,210 as well as 5% per annum from February 26, 2013 to July 11, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and announcement 1) Project approval: Public announcement of an urban development project (B district urban development zone 2): C on December 13, 2007; public announcement of the project approval on May 21, 2009; notification D on May 21, 2009; notification of the project approval on January 14, 2010; notification of the project approval on January 14, 2010: Defendant;

B. Persons to be expropriated on May 1, 2012 by the Gyeongnam-do Regional Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “instant land”): F, G, and H land in Kimhae-si (hereinafter “instant land”).

3) As to the ground “I(J)”, the obstacles described in attached Table 1 to the “I(J)” (hereinafter “instant obstacles”).

(2) Compensation date: Compensation for losses for the instant obstacles (including facility relocation expenses), 136,628,550 won: 136,628,550 won: 4) The contents of the adjudication: 136,628,550 won: the light appraisal corporation, the appraisal corporation, and the appraisal corporation as a substitute appraisal corporation: 5). As to the assertion that the omitted items are reflected, it is confirmed that there is no material omitted as a result of the Defendant’s on-site investigation, and thus, is groundless. (2) As to the assertion that the transfer of water, signboards, etc. which cannot be used for the previous purpose, the determination that the transfer of water, etc. is without merit. (3) As to the claim for business compensation, it is deemed that the inspection corporation is not subject to business compensation because it falls under the building without permission, and the compensation for losses was appropriately calculated in accordance with the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes. (4) The Plaintiff’s appraisal corporation’s report on the increase of compensation for losses was without merit.