Suwon District Court-2016-B-79304 (Law No. 28, 2017)

(Trial Incompetence) Whether a deposit share trust agreement constitutes a fraudulent act

(C) In light of the above legal principles, it is reasonable to deem that the account holder’s name trust agreement was concluded between the debtor and the defendant, e.g., the account holder’s name trust agreement with the debtor and the defendant, e.g., the account holder’s name trust agreement was concluded.

Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act: Revocation and Restoration of Fraudulent Act

2017Da2735 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

B. Incidental Appellant

Korea

-Supplementary Appellee

Ma-○

Suwon District Court Decision 2016Na79304 Decided September 28, 2017

All appeals and supplementary appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Examining the judgment of the court below and the grounds of incidental appeal, the grounds of appeal by appellant and the grounds of incidental appeal by incidental appellant are not included in the grounds of each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3). Thus, all appeals and supplementary appeal are dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the