1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) is a land being used as a site for A apartment, and the Plaintiff is a maintenance and improvement project association established to proceed with A apartment reconstruction projects.

B. B and E were registered as co-owners of the instant land, and E succeeded to the deceased on September 1, 2007 (hereinafter “the deceased E”)’s wife C, B, and D’s property.

C. Based on the attachment disposition, Defendant Republic of Korea completed the attachment registration with respect to B’s share of 377.20/365 of the instant land among the instant land as the Daejeon District Court’s Daejeon District Court’s receipt on June 25, 2004, No. 39052, 39053, 39054, and receipt on October 4, 2004 by the same registry office, as the receipt on October 4, 2004, and as to B’s share of 2398.4m2 in the Dong-gu, Daejeon District Court’s receipt on June 20, 2008.

In addition, the defendant Republic of Korea completed the attachment registration under the receipt of No. 59283 of Oct. 20, 2009 on Oct. 20, 2009, as the Daejeon District Court’s Daejeon District Court’s receipt of Oct. 20, 2009, and No. 6309 of Feb. 9, 2010, respectively.

E. Defendant Seoul Special Metropolitan City completed the attachment registration of the instant land under the Daejeon District Court Daejeon District Court’s South Daejeon District Court’s receipt of February 5, 2010, No. 5728, 5729, 5730.

F. The residents of G et al. (hereinafter “B et al.”) filed a lawsuit claiming ownership transfer registration that “this case’s land was jointly owned by co-owners, including A apartment residents, B, etc., but it was awarded a favorable judgment by filing a lawsuit claiming ownership transfer registration based on the cancellation of a mutual title trust against B, C, and D (hereinafter “instant land”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, 5, Eul evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the cause of the claim and the land of this case and the Dong-gu Daejeon District H.