Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who has worked as a skill examiner of “EA” located in Gyeonggi-si from November 5, 2012 to June 26, 2013, and Defendant B is a person who has served as a skill instructor at the pertinent private teaching institute from October 2010 to August 2013.

1. On June 8, 2013, between 16:00 and 16:50, the Defendants’ co-offenders, as a matter of principle, conduct the road driving test of F, who is the students of the above driving school, and as a matter of principle, the superintendent G, who is a witness at the above driving school, must join the school as a witness. When the G was unable to take the seat of G, the Defendant A requested the Defendant B to join the school as a witness on behalf of the witness, and the Defendant B accepted the request, and agreed to manipulate the records as the witness, and agreed to manipulate the completion of the road driving test as the witness, and signed it in the digital signature column of the witness at the electronic grading machine.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit a special media record, such as electronic records of public officials or public offices, for the purpose of hindering the management of affairs.

2. On June 8, 2013, Defendant A, as a skill examiner at the foregoing private teaching institute, entered false information as if a normal level of road parking test was conducted in a way that a student’s level of lifelong parking began and finished servers are put in order, although there was no fact that the student’s level of road driving test was conducted with respect to the other five students, Defendant A entered false information.

Accordingly, the media records such as electronic records of public officials or public offices were forged for the purpose of making business process smooth.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing investigation instruction and log-record;

1. Article 227-2 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting the crime: Provided, That Article 30 of the Criminal Act shall apply to the facts constituting the crime of Article 1 of the judgment;