logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.04.25 2017누88550
증여세등부과처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance as well as the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance as follows 2. Thus, it shall be accepted as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. The amended part of the judgment of the first instance is as follows: "Plaintiff A" and "Plaintiff company" are as "Plaintiff joint Plaintiff of the first instance court" and "Defendant E-Mapo Tax Office" are as "Defendant". The part concerning "4-11 of the first instance judgment" is deleted from "No. 1 through 4, 7, 8, Eul evidence, Eul evidence No. 1, 2, 4, 66 of the first instance judgment as to "No. 4. 5 of the first instance judgment," and the part concerning "No. 4. 5 of the first instance judgment as to "No. 1 to 4000,000,0000.

6-16 deleted from the 7th to 5th place below. The 5th 6-16th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 5th 17th 7th 3-4th 7th 7th 6th 7th 7th 4th 7th 5th 6th 7th 6th 7th 6th 6th 7th 6th 7th 7th 1

7. The 5th parallel to the last parallel shall be deleted.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant as to the issue at the trial room is reasonable and acceptable.

The judgment of the court of first instance as to this part is just in conclusion, and thus, the defendant is the defendant.

arrow