The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

annex . of claim.

1. The reasons for the acceptance by the court of first instance are as follows, and the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, except for the further determination as to the assertion emphasized by the defendant in this court under paragraph (2).

(The main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). The following three-seven parts are advanced:

As set out in each of the instant notes, regarding the entire heading rooms of the studio building and the studio building on the H ground in Gwangju-gu (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “studio of this case”) on August 23, 2013, the registration of creation of a mortgage (hereinafter referred to as the “mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-mortgage-backed

[Along with the three pages, the term “explosive” means “explosive” and the term “explosive” means “explosive,” and the term “explosive,” respectively. The four pages are as follows: “The first and second agreements of this case” of the first and second agreements are as follows: “The Plaintiff shall borrow money from D in order to raise money to return to the Plaintiff pursuant to the first agreement of this case; on December 19, 2013, the Plaintiff shall obtain money from D in order to secure its father’s debt; on December 19, 2013, the Plaintiff shall set up a collateral of KRW 10,000,000 for L, the maximum debt amount of KRW 10,215 square meters; and on December 4, 2015, the Plaintiff shall not return the money from C in the first and second agreements; and on the other hand, the Plaintiff shall not obtain or cancel the money from C in the first and second agreements of this case.”

5 The 10th page "it can be confirmed that the agreement was reached," thereby, the plaintiff was entrusted to C with the above 117,000 shareholders' list.

5 Under 5, the term “as shown in the above letter” is to be owned by the Plaintiff and C by dividing the entire shares of E.