1. As to the Plaintiff’s 696 square meters prior to Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do, and the 621 square meters prior to C, the Defendant shall have the Dongcheon District Court’s registry office.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The land survey division and the land survey division in Gyeonggi-do, the Gyeonggi-do, the Hancheon-gun, the Hancheon-gun, the land survey division written in the Hancheon-gun, the Hancheon-gun, the land survey division and the old land register stated that G was subject to assessment. G is also written in the owner column of the old land register with respect to the land of this case.

B. The division of the mother land of this case and the Defendant’s registration of preservation of ownership was changed into 696 square meters and 621 square meters prior to the Gyeonggi-do Hri-gun (hereinafter “Hri”) through the division, administrative district name change, area conversion, etc.

(2) The Defendant completed the registration of ownership preservation as to the land of this case, No. 11582, Nov. 18, 1994, respectively.

C. On February 20, 1917, I, an inheritance-related plaintiff, died, and due to the death of the head of the family and the inheritance of the property of the Republic of Korea, J, South-Nam, and upon the death of the said J on November 2, 1950, K, the South-North Family and the inheritance of the property of Australia and the Republic of Korea.

As the above K died on January 11, 2002, he/she jointly succeeded to L, M, N,O, P, and the Plaintiff’s property as his/her child, and upon the death of the above L on April 11, 2009, he/she jointly succeeded to his/her property by Q, who is his/her husband, and R, S, T, and U, who are his/her husband. As such, on December 10, 201, the Plaintiff and M, N,O, P, Q, R, T, and U, who jointly succeeded to or succeeded to the property of the Plaintiff, jointly inherited or succeeded to the property of the Plaintiff.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 4, 6 through 8 (including paper numbers), the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. (1) Determination as to the cause of the claim 1) The above basic facts and the fact inquiry as to V of the Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, and the court’s fact finding as to the above basic facts are the same person. The following circumstances are revealed.