1. The defendant shall receive the Dongcheon District Court's annual registry office with respect to the plaintiff with respect to 22810 square meters of Gyeonggi-gun B forest land.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The report on the survey of the forest land in Gyeonggi-do Cricheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do, which was made during the Japanese colonial era of land under the instant circumstances is indicated as being subject to D’s assessment of KRW B 2,000.

B. The registration-related land was pointed out as the land indicated in the order (hereinafter “instant land”) after conversion into the area unit, and the registration of ownership preservation on October 29, 1996 was completed on October 29, 1996, following the procedure for disposal of unregistered real estate.

(hereinafter “instant preservation registration”). (c)

1) On May 3, 193, the F, whose permanent domicile is Gyeonggicheon-gun E, was deceased on May 3, 193, and she succeeded to Australia and its property. G was married with I, and H was born to South J and the next South K. However, H was deceased on April 2, 1947, and J was deceased on August 24, 1950, while G was deceased on October 12, 1950, and C was deceased on July 25, 2005, and his heir was deceased on July 25, 2005, and there was no Dong-gun’s permanent domicile under Gyeonggi-gun’s name. On the other hand, there was no Dong-gun’s legal domicile under the name of Gyeonggi-gun.

【In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap evidence 1 through 7, and the fact-finding with respect to the office of the OY-gun Office of Gyeonggi-do.

2. Determination

A. In the absence of counter-proof such as the change of the content by the adjudication, the person who was registered as the owner in the land survey register or the forest survey register for cancellation of the preservation registration of this case shall be presumed to have been the owner of the land and the circumstance shall be presumed to have become final and conclusive. The person who received the assessment of the land

(See Supreme Court Decision 98Da13686 delivered on September 8, 1998). Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances, K, including the Plaintiff, acquired the ownership of the instant land from an original point of view by determining the circumstances upon the Plaintiff’s high-helper’s assessment of the instant land, and thereafter, K’s inheritors, including the Plaintiff, jointly acquired the instant land.