logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.08.10 2017고단1632
보조금관리에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant raises Chinese rain in D in South Sung-gun C.

In accordance with the Special Act on Assistance to Agricultural and Fishery Business Operators, etc. following the Conclusion of Free Trade Agreements, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Ministry of Food and Agriculture (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Act on Assistance to Agricultural and Fishing Business Operators, etc. following the Conclusion of Free Trade Agreements"), where it is deemed difficult to continue the business of cultivating, raising, catching, collecting, or cultivating items such as fruit trees, horticultural, stock farming, and fishery, etc., the business of paying subsidies for the discontinuance of business was carried out when a farmer, etc. closes the business. According to the relevant statutes

The Defendant and the Defendant attempted to sell 13 of Korea-China 68 of Korea-China 68, which was raised by the Defendant, to receive the 13 of Korea-China 13 of Korea-China 13 of Korea-China 13 of Korea-China 68, but did not dispose of Korea-China 13 of Korea-China 13 of Korea-China 13 of Korea-China 13 of Korea.

In order to receive a subsidy for discontinuance of business, the Defendant shall submit a written application for the payment of subsidy for discontinuance of agricultural business, etc. to the Sungsung-gun in August 2013, and submit a written confirmation of performance of follow-up management after the receipt of the subsidy for discontinuance of business in March 2014, stating that “the spouse of a person eligible for the subsidy for discontinuance of business, etc. or his/her lineal ascendant or descendant cannot dispose of livestock” around March 2014, and dispose of the subsidy for discontinuance of business in a normal manner, such as selling or slaughter of 68 cattle cattle raised until November 30, 2014.

On November 25, 2014, the Defendant, along with E and F, was unable to dispose of 13 out of 68 Korean-China 68, which was raised by the Defendant on November 25, 2014, by moving 13 13 to F’s stable to F’s freight, raising them. On the other hand, the Defendant filed a false report with F as if the Defendant trading 13 of Korean-China 13 normally with F, under the name of the Defendant.

arrow