logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.09.03 2014고정762
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 15, 2012, the defrauded knew that food expenses are stored in the hospital in the name of the victim D, who is a private village hospitalized at C Hospital located in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, and as if he obtained the victim’s permission, the Defendant acquired KRW 100,000 from the hospital to the person in charge of the hospital “the deduction of KRW 100,000 from the simple food expenses in the future,” and then acquired the victim by fraud.

2. The Defendant opened a mobile phone in the above D name, opened an account, and received a subsidy from the mobile operator and thought that he will use the subsidy.

On January 25, 2013, the Defendant presented D’s resident registration certificate held by the employee in charge as if the Defendant was D, and forged a written application for deposit transaction, which is a private document on rights and obligations under the name of D, and submitted it to the said employee in charge, who was unaware of the fact.

B. On January 25, 2013, the Defendant presented the D’s resident registration certificate at F branch, which is a mobile phone sales store located in Daegu-gun E, as if the Defendant was D, which was possessed by the employee in charge, as if the Defendant was D, and prepared a false copy of “the application for change of mobile phone compensation,” which is a private document on the rights and obligations in the name of D, and submitted it to the said G with no knowledge of the fact.

C. On February 19, 2013, the Defendant was at the above F point.

In the same manner as described in paragraph (d), one "application for mobile phone number movement" in the name of D was prepared, forged, and submitted to the above G with no knowledge of the fact.

around March 29, 2013, the Defendant was at the above F point.

In the same manner as described in the paragraph, one “application for new opening of mobile phones” was prepared, forged, and submitted to the said G with no knowledge of the fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow