logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2020.08.25 2017고정875
사기등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) called “to subscribe to an insurance for loss of mobile phones; and (b) received a resident registration certificate in the name of B from the above B from the said B by advertising that he/she would subscribe to the insurance for loss of mobile phones; and (c) did not intend to dispose of the mobile phone in the name of B under the name of B without permission from the said B.

On March 22, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime of March 22, 2016, by forging one copy of the application for mobile phone entry in the above B’s name by stating “B”, “D” in the name column of entry, “B” in the address column, “B”, and “B” in the customer signature column of the application for entry, and by submitting a copy of the resident registration certificate in the above B’s name and the resident registration certificate in the above B’s name to the employee in charge of H agency without knowing that the said application for entry was forged through G.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one copy of the application for joining the mobile phone in B’s name, and exercised the application for joining the mobile phone in B’s name as above to an employee affiliated with H agency who is unaware of the fact.

B. On March 24, 2016, the Defendant, on March 24, 2016, forged one copy of the application for mobile phone entry in the above B’s name by stating “B”, “D” in the name column, “B” in the address column, “B”, and “B” in the customer signature column in the name of the applicant for entry into a non-permanent place, and exercised the above method by submitting one copy of the application for mobile phone entry in the above B’s name and one copy of the resident registration certificate in the above B’s name, and a copy of the resident registration certificate in the above B’s name without knowing that the said application for entry into a mobile phone was forged through G.

Accordingly, the defendant forges one copy of the application for joining the mobile phone in B's name for the purpose of exercising his right, and the mobile phone in B's above.

arrow