logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013. 12. 26. 선고 2013두18353 판결
(심리불속행) 명의신탁에 있어 조세회피의 의도가 없었다고 단정할 수는 없다고 할 것임[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court (Chuncheon) 2012Nu534 (Seoul High Court, 2013.24)

Title

(In the case of a title trust, it shall not be readily concluded that there was no intention of tax avoidance in the name trust.

Summary

(C) The Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have had no intention of tax avoidance in title trust under tax law, solely on the ground that there is no substantial amount of tax on the dividend income that could be avoided through title trust, or that there is no tax avoidance or reduced tax on the shares through a single title trust.

Related statutes

Legal fiction of donation of title trust property under Article 45-2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2013Du18353 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

LAA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Three Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court (Chuncheon) Decision 2012Nu534 Decided July 24, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow