logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013. 12. 26. 선고 2013두18339 판결
명의신탁에 있어 조세회피의 의도가 없었다고 단정할 수는 없다고 할 것임[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court (Chuncheon) 2012Nu237 (Law No. 24, 2013)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2010 Heavy2465 ( October 12, 2010)

Title

In title trust, it cannot be readily concluded that there was no intention of tax avoidance in title trust.

Summary

Inasmuch as the amount of tax on the dividend income that can be avoided through the title trust is not significant, or there is no reduced tax avoidance or reduced tax on the shares through the title trust, it cannot be readily concluded that there was no intention of tax avoidance in the title trust under tax law in the title trust.

Related statutes

Article 45-2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2013Du18339 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing gift tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

AAA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of the District Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court (Chuncheon) Decision 2012Nu237 Decided July 24, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the above Act. It is so

arrow