logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2017.05.31 2016가단123806
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants: (a) KRW 200,000, respectively, and 5% per annum from April 18, 2014 to May 31, 2017, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff was found to have been recognized.

G. In relation to the structure of H sinking accidents, a broadcasting company, made a false interview to the effect that the maritime police officer, as a private diving unit, participated in the H rescue operation, even though he/she did not have participated in the H rescue operation, he/she did not have participated in the H rescue operation. At the time, he/she had an interview to the effect that, as a private diving unit, the maritime police officers are blocking the rescue operation of the private diving unit without providing support to the

The interview was broadcast on the day, and the articles related to the plaintiff were reported by many media companies.

However, some of the interview facts, including the fact that the Plaintiff was not a diving book, were revealed falsely in MBN, and thereafter, the Plaintiff was detained by stating false facts and thereby impairing the honor of the Commissioner General of the Korea Coast Guard, etc., and was indicted on January 9, 2015, and was pronounced not guilty at the appellate court on September 1, 2016.

The defendants are on the date of the above broadcast.

G. The following comments were written and posted on the bulletin board / [K] of the following DUM “K” (the Plaintiff had a false interview but was locked upon the date of the investigation) of Internet portal clocks:

- 피고 B : 잡아다 쳐넣어 고소좋아한다며 이년 ㅡㅡ역으로 쳐먹어봐라 얼빠진년 - 피고 C : 미친년아 어딜 숨어 - 피고 D : 미친년아 넌뒤졌어 - 피고 E : 미친년 - 피고 F : 진짜뭐하는미친년인지;; [인정근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑1~7, 16호증의 각 기재

2. Determination:

A. The Defendants posted an article on the Internet website bulletin that enables an unspecified number of people to confirm the contents of the article and thereby harming the Plaintiff’s social reputation, thereby committing a tort that insults the Plaintiff. Therefore, the Defendants are obliged to compensate for mental suffering suffered by the Plaintiff in money.

B. The amount of consolation money is the following circumstances: the Defendants’ age, the background leading up to writing comments, the degree of insult, and subsequent circumstances.

arrow