logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.03.30 2016고단4732
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

One year of imprisonment with prison labor for the remaining crimes of KRW 1,00,000 and one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of KRW 3 of the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On February 18, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year with labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and two years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 26, 2016.

[Criminal facts] 2016 Highest 4732

1. The Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

On September 15, 2016, at around 00:30, the Defendant administered a philophone in a way that mecons with mecons with mecons (i.e., one philopopon, one philopon, and one philopon), a local mental medicine, in front of a mutually influent restaurant located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu.

2. On September 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on September 17, 2016, around Daegu D Building; (b) on the part of the victim E with the victim, the victim’s horse dispute with the victim; and (c) on the rise from the vehicle from the vehicle to the point of view, the Defendant’s damage caused the damage of property by adding the said car to the said car so that the said car amounting to KRW 1,015,727, the size of the driver’s part of the car and the top gate of the steering.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 409" had the intention to use a credit card, mobile phone, and post office by stealing the name of the Gu in the private village.

3. Violation of the Resident Registration Act;

A. On November 2015, the Defendant applied for a cable broadcasting installation device at the office of the Defendant, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, for a modern department store card, and unlawfully used the name and resident number of G for the purpose of identification verification.

B. On April 26, 2016, the Defendant applied for one card to a counselor at the one card call center via telephone calls at a minor place, and used the name and resident number of G unlawfully for the purpose of identification verification.

(c)

On April 27, 2016, the Defendant applied for a new card call center counselor via telephone calls at a closed location, and used G name and resident number unlawfully for the purpose of identification verification.

(d)

On April 27, 2016, the Defendant calls at a non-permanent place.

arrow