A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On April 20, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daegu District Court racing support.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 00:45 on January 14, 2020, the Defendant was driving a 1 ton truck of F-wing and 3 ton without obtaining a driver’s license with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.072% from the section of approximately 2 km to the road in the same city as “E” located in D at the same time from the front of the “C” road in the Si-si on January 14, 2020.

As a result, the defendant was a person with the power of violating the Road Traffic Act's prohibition of drinking driving, and driving a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver's license under the influence of alcohol.

2. On January 14, 2020, at around 00:57, the Defendant: (a) performed drinking and unlicensed driving on the roads prior to the “E” located in P, P, and around 0:57, as described in paragraph (1) on the front of the “E” road at P, the Defendant: (b) controlled H by police officers belonging to G department of the racing and Police Station; and (c) demanded the preparation of a report on the circumstantial statement of the driver; (d) without authority, the Defendant forged one copy of the report on the circumstantial statement of the driver, which was made under the name of P, a private document related to the certification of facts, by entering the “I” in the “written statement of the driver” column of the said report as “I”; and (e) subsequently, exercised the report on the circumstantial statement of the driver to the police officer who was aware of the forgery, as if the report was duly concluded.

3. The Defendant, as stated in Paragraph 2, committed a crackdown on the police officer at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, as stated in Paragraph 2, and without authority to exercise his/her authority to exercise his/her personal portable information device (PDA)’s drinking control over the Defendant’s personal portable information device (PDA), for which the police officer requested the signature.