A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of two years and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 7, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million by the Suwon District Court for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

1. On November 4, 2019, the Defendant was driving a B K5 vehicle while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.11% without a driver’s license in a section of about 400 meters from the front side to the front side of the water viewing, after viewing the water source located in the Suwon-gu hand-on hand-on, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and then driving a B K5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.11% without a driver’s license.

As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, and simultaneously driven a motor vehicle without a driver's license.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, which was controlled by drinking driving at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and was in advance demanded to present a driver’s license by Suwon-Nam Police Station C superintendent D, Suwon-nam Police Station C superintendent of the police station, and used the Defendant’s type E resident registration number (F) unlawfully.

3. The Defendant: (a) entered the personal information of E in a portable information terminal (PDA) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), as stated in paragraph (2); (b) entered the personal information of E in a portable information terminal (PDA); (c) made the electronic signature “E” at his/her discretion, who is requested by the Gyeong to order the driver of the notification of the result of the drinking driving control from the Gyeong; and (d) made the Gyeong who is unaware of the above writing, sent the file of the written notification of the drinking control to the police network as if he/she was genuine and genuine.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature and exercised it for the purpose of exercising it.

4. When the Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, was subject to drinking control from the horse D at the time and place, and when the Defendant got to do so, the Defendant arbitrarily stated “E” in the name column of the driver’s statement in the written circumstantial statement of the driver’s opinion by using the cryp mix, without authority, for the purpose of exercising as if he were type E.