Of the instant lawsuit, the part of each claim against the Defendants in Plaintiff B is dismissed.

Defendant F and H jointly do so.

Based on the facts, Plaintiff A is a patient who was hospitalized in the J Hospital located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). Plaintiff B is the spouse, Plaintiff C, D, and E of the Plaintiff.

Defendant H is the head of the hospital, who is the representative of the Defendant Hospital.

Plaintiff

On May 21, 2016, Plaintiff A hospitalized the Defendant Hospital in half-latera (ssemicoma) on the same day after reporting at around 20:31 on May 21, 2016 at around 20:00.

On the same day, Defendant G, a doctor outside of the Defendant hospital, diagnosed Plaintiff G’s name as brain resistant resistant transfusion (interebal hemorhage, and ICH) with which the name of the Plaintiff A was unknown, and performed the Plaintiff’s two tension combomy and mama re-maral therapy (indecompresy).

On July 18, 2016, when the Defendant Hospital was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, there was an accident that the Plaintiff’s medical staff at the Defendant Hospital’s hospital was removed from the floor in the course of transferring the Plaintiff’s rehabilitation treatment at the Defendant Hospital’s nursing room to the Plaintiff’s nursing room (hereinafter “the instant abortion”). On July 19, 2016, the medical staff at the Defendant Hospital’s hospital for diagnosis and operation conducted diagnosis and operation after the instant abortion conducted a computer short-rise of the Plaintiff’s brain computer (Common Emmpiphy, CT) on July 17, 2016, compared with the Plaintiff’s medical treatment on June 23, 2016, the left-hand side lusium was newly observed in the process of transferring the Plaintiff’s rehabilitation treatment at the Defendant Hospital to the Plaintiff’s nursing room (hereinafter “the instant abortion”). In comparison with the Plaintiff’s medical staff at the Defendant Hospital’s medical staff at the Defendant Hospital’s hospital, and confirmed that the brain was in an extended condition to the left le.

At around 14:00 on July 20, 2016, Defendant G diagnosed Plaintiff A’s name as brain resistant surgery with which it is unknown, and performed the Plaintiff A with an amount equal to the amount of the cSF’s cSF’s cSF correction method, blood species removal method, and brain cSF amount.

Since August 2, 2016, Defendant G is a room for the Plaintiff on August 2, 2016 where there is an excessive amount of hydrodalus and brain trees.