logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2007. 02. 07. 선고 2006누14515 판결
상속세법에 의한 보충적 평가방법에 의해 주식평가시 1주당 평가가액이 정당한지 여부[국패]
Title

Whether a stock evaluation value per stock is reasonable at the time of stock evaluation by supplementary evaluation methods under the Inheritance Tax Act;

Summary

In assessing the value of shares, there was an error of calculating the net asset value of ○○ Insurance, which is an incidental insurance, by zero, and in calculating the weighted average amount of net profits and losses for the last three years per share, it is illegal disposal because it did not properly record the base date.

Reasons

Seoul Administrative Court 2005Guhap36684 (Law No. 24, 2006)

Related statutes

Donation of property registered in the name of a third party under Article 32-2 of the former Inheritance Tax Act;

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

Each imposition of KRW 2,829,187,290 on the ground of the gift made by the Defendant against the Plaintiff on January 13, 1993 and KRW 1,020,95,670 on the ground of the gift made on April 12, 1993 shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

This court's reasoning is the same as the entry in the column of reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow