Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 28, 2017, at around 11:52 to 12:08, the Defendant was issued a penalty from the police officer affiliated with the Seoul Geum-cheon Police Station C police box at the front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Seoul, for a violation of signal at the front of B, and used the same police box affiliated with the same police box at the same time, and assaulted E by cutting off the spabling.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic control.

Summary of Evidence

1. A legal statement by the defendant to the effect that he has performed the escape of E:

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Application of the witness D’s statutory statement legislation;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Penalty)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant did not interfere with a police officer’s lawful performance of duty, in a case where E first attempts to go beyond himself/herself and set up against his/her e/ her e/ her e/spath in the process of setting up a defense against the Defendant’s assertion as to Articles 70(1) and 69(2)(1) of the Criminal Act.

D consistently and consistently held that “the Defendant’s breath and breathing the flath’s bat and flath’s bat, and “E” means “the Defendant’s hand and flading the Defendant’s hand.”

In addition, even if all other evidences are examined, E does not appear to have first been tried to go beyond the defendant, and thus, the above assertion is rejected.

However, the Defendant stated to the effect that, as consistent from the police to this court, the Defendant consistently followed the wind that E was “satise” and fatd one another. However, the Defendant was not a police officer, who issued a penalty, but a police officer, and was next to the two.

E without sea, “I amen, 40,000 foots, Macen, 50,000 won,”

It is difficult to dump with a hot spring while putting a bath as “a bump”, and ③ the Defendant is actually in fact.