logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2017.06.16 2017고정187
협박
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged: (a) on October 9, 2016, the Defendant: (b) unloaded on the ground and returned to the victim D, who was leaving the celdo to recover water from the curine located in the north-gu, Northern-si, Northern-si; (c) opened the fluor door and opened the fluor door with the fluor in hand without any justifiable reason; (d) opened the fluor door with the driver’s seat; and (e) threatened the victim with the desire, such as “this fluor and fluor”, and fluened on the ground and then threatened the victim with drinking, and threatened the victim as “this fluor and fluor”, and as drinking.

2. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts charged for judgment: A judgment dismissing a victim's non-existence of punishment after the prosecution under Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act).

arrow