Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 27, 2016, around 21:55, the Defendant refused to withdraw, and on the ground that the insurance purchased by the victim D and the victim E was terminated by the victims, the Defendant’s insurance was terminated by the victims at the 104-dong, Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government 104-dong, 406-dong, Seocho-gu.

During the time of protest, “A police officer failed to comply with a request for withdrawal from the victims without justifiable grounds, even if he/she received a request for request from the victims.”

2. The Defendant’s insultd the victims at the above time, and at the same time and place, “as the wind that the victims cancel the insurance, the same fluor, and four-year fluore, the insurance company was fluored and the insurance company was terminated, so four-year fluore is being treated.

The victims were openly insulting by openly obsing them to “datis to guarantee their livelihood.”

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as above, should be deemed to have been engaged in funeral services in favor of the victims in a low-year friende;

Does it be equal to that of a dog, a dog, the same year, his son, the marriage ceremony, or a proper fashion;

Dok Seoul High-speed bus is also the same as that of its high-speed bus

“The victims and their children threatened victims of any physical and property damage, as they may cause any physical and property damage.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, F, and E;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police interrogation protocol to G and H;

1. Article 319(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act in relation to the facts constituting an offense (the point of refusal to leave), Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intimidation) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.