The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged was that the Defendant decided to operate the Victim B and the Car Center business, but the injured party did not reach the mind of the Defendant, and was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s alteration of the construction company without contact with the Defendant.

A. The Defendant, on the ground that a person who suffered damage around April 2016 did not pay the construction cost of KRW 25 million to the victim, by telephone, “Chewing”

f. Internal Gayece Gaece Gaecea

Along with money, this lids lids will be cut off.

C. Intimidation in the early fashion of Mad';

B. The Defendant sent the victim by telephone around September 2016, to the victim, “hicker and d.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.

Because of width, how or not damage is reported.

b) intimidating her face reporting her face and threatening her face reporting defect;

C. The Defendant, around November 2016, in a D restaurant located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju in order to receive money from the victim for “Chewing feas and construction.”

Such a lid lid is called "Hahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim can be acknowledged that he/she expressed his/her intention not to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.