logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.07.25 2017가단211927
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In around 2005, the Plaintiff entered into a carpet service contract with the Defendant, which operates the Internet portal site’s “the following Drum,” and operated a carpet with “B” online carpet (hereinafter “instant carpet”).

According to Article 5 of the above Ka Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa P

Article 8(2) of the Terms and Conditions of this case (hereinafter “instant provision”) provides that “In the event that there is no Ka Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa

B. On May 6, 2016, the Defendant sent an e-mail to the Plaintiff to the effect that he/she would have been expected to proceed with the delegation of authority by notifying the Plaintiff that he/she would have access to the car page and would have access to the car page if he/she would wish to do so.

Defendant of the same month

9. On the 26th of the same month, the member who filed the application for the Ka Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa P, changed the Ka Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa P,

C. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff entered the Gun on July 7, 2014 and was discharged from military service on July 6, 2016, and the Plaintiff did not access the instant car page as well as during the period of military service.

On February 2017, the Plaintiff came to know that the instant car page was changed to another person, and requested the Defendant to revoke it, but did not accept it.

[Ground for recognition] A.

arrow